The remaining users calling __skb_frag_set_page() with
page being NULL seems to be doing defensive programming,
as shinfo->nr_frags is already decremented, so remove
them.
Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
shinfo->nr_frags--;
page = skb_frag_page(&shinfo->frags[shinfo->nr_frags]);
- __skb_frag_set_page(&shinfo->frags[shinfo->nr_frags], NULL);
cons_rx_pg->page = page;
dev_kfree_skb(skb);
xdp_buff_set_frag_pfmemalloc(xdp);
if (bnxt_alloc_rx_page(bp, rxr, prod, GFP_ATOMIC) != 0) {
- unsigned int nr_frags;
-
- nr_frags = --shinfo->nr_frags;
- __skb_frag_set_page(&shinfo->frags[nr_frags], NULL);
+ --shinfo->nr_frags;
cons_rx_buf->page = page;
/* Update prod since possibly some pages have been
fragto->bv_page = fragfrom->bv_page;
}
-/**
- * __skb_frag_set_page - sets the page contained in a paged fragment
- * @frag: the paged fragment
- * @page: the page to set
- *
- * Sets the fragment @frag to contain @page.
- */
-static inline void __skb_frag_set_page(skb_frag_t *frag, struct page *page)
-{
- frag->bv_page = page;
-}
-
bool skb_page_frag_refill(unsigned int sz, struct page_frag *pfrag, gfp_t prio);
/**