]> git.itanic.dy.fi Git - linux-stable/commitdiff
cifs: adjust sequence number downward after signing NT_CANCEL request
authorJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Thu, 27 Dec 2012 13:05:03 +0000 (08:05 -0500)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:19:02 +0000 (09:19 -0800)
commit 31efee60f489c759c341454d755a9fd13de8c03d upstream.

When a call goes out, the signing code adjusts the sequence number
upward by two to account for the request and the response. An NT_CANCEL
however doesn't get a response of its own, it just hurries the server
along to get it to respond to the original request more quickly.
Therefore, we must adjust the sequence number back down by one after
signing a NT_CANCEL request.

Reported-by: Tim Perry <tdparmor-sambabugs@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
fs/cifs/smb1ops.c

index 34cea27983335fbf9dea43697cc8663ecf5aa091..591bf1932e3bcd41a161e46e7fce2a6816aa4555 100644 (file)
@@ -53,6 +53,13 @@ send_nt_cancel(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, void *buf,
                mutex_unlock(&server->srv_mutex);
                return rc;
        }
+
+       /*
+        * The response to this call was already factored into the sequence
+        * number when the call went out, so we must adjust it back downward
+        * after signing here.
+        */
+       --server->sequence_number;
        rc = smb_send(server, in_buf, be32_to_cpu(in_buf->smb_buf_length));
        mutex_unlock(&server->srv_mutex);