When building with -Wmissing-prototypes without CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG, there
is a warning about a missing prototype for is_valid_bugaddr():
arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:46:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'is_valid_bugaddr' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
46 | int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long addr)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The prototype is only declared with CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG, so only define the
function under the same condition to clear up the warning, which matches
other architectures.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130-s390-missing-prototypes-v1-2-799d3cf07fb7@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jan Höppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
return (void __user *) (address - (regs->int_code >> 16));
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG
int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long addr)
{
return 1;
}
+#endif
void do_report_trap(struct pt_regs *regs, int si_signo, int si_code, char *str)
{