When building bcachefs for 32-bit ARM, there is a warning when using
max() to compare an expression involving 'size_t' with an 'unsigned
long' literal:
fs/bcachefs/movinggc.c:159:21: error: comparison of distinct pointer types ('typeof (16UL) *' (aka 'unsigned long *') and 'typeof (buckets_in_flight->nr / 4) *' (aka 'unsigned int *')) [-Werror,-Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types]
159 | size_t nr_to_get = max(16UL, buckets_in_flight->nr / 4);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/minmax.h:76:19: note: expanded from macro 'max'
76 | #define max(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, >)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/minmax.h:38:24: note: expanded from macro '__careful_cmp'
38 | __builtin_choose_expr(__safe_cmp(x, y), \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/minmax.h:28:4: note: expanded from macro '__safe_cmp'
28 | (__typecheck(x, y) && __no_side_effects(x, y))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/minmax.h:22:28: note: expanded from macro '__typecheck'
22 | (!!(sizeof((typeof(x) *)1 == (typeof(y) *)1)))
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 error generated.
On 64-bit architectures, size_t is 'unsigned long', so there is no
warning when comparing these two expressions. Use max_t(size_t, ...) for
this situation, eliminating the warning.
Fixes: dd49018737d4 ("bcachefs: Rhashtable based buckets_in_flight for copygc")
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
struct bch_fs *c = trans->c;
struct btree_iter iter;
struct bkey_s_c k;
- size_t nr_to_get = max(16UL, buckets_in_flight->nr / 4);
+ size_t nr_to_get = max_t(size_t, 16U, buckets_in_flight->nr / 4);
size_t saw = 0, in_flight = 0, not_movable = 0, sectors = 0;
int ret;